Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WHITLEY v. STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS, 50 A.3d 9 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland Number: inmdco20120817276 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM ORDER. For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 17th day of August, 2012, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be paid by the Appellants. Mandate to issue forthwith.

ORDER

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 17th day of August, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be paid by the Appellants. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer